Dynadot

Start banning members

NameSilo
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

S-B

Account Closed
Impact
5,263
NamePros and its leadership has gone soft.

Start banning toxic members like @Michael Ehrhardt. It is utterly absurd that he is allowed to troll the forum. I'd be willing to bet he has received more dislikes and reports in the last week than any other member has in the history of the forum. It's pathetic that he's allowed to represent such a great community. The thing that disgusts me the most is he's being defended by NPs leadership.

If you want to spit in our faces, do it yourself.

Now I know the response is going to be that he's been warned. Whatever. With that many reports he should be banned.



Solved: https://www.namepros.com/posts/5553087/

Thread closed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
14
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
What has he done to warrant a ban?

Yet to read any of his posts...


I agree that trollish type of members ought to be restricted.

Particularly so if they are new and far from established/VIP.

It is a great that NamePros has done so well at vetting the nonsense so that established members co-create an awesome community.
 
0
•••
What has he done to warrant a ban?

Yet to read any of his posts...

He pads his post count, insults people's core beliefs, and antagonizes everyone he comes across. All of which are against forum rules. Take a look at his posts.
 
0
•••
He pads his post count, insults people's core beliefs, and antagonizes everyone he comes across. All of which are against forum rules. Take a look at his posts.


No room for that here


This forum is for pros, not trolls.
 
6
•••
1
•••
NamePros and its leadership has gone soft.

Start banning toxic members like @Michael Ehrhardt. It is utterly absurd that he is allowed to troll the forum. I'd be willing to bet he has received more dislikes and reports in the last week than any other member has in the history of the forum. It's pathetic that he's allowed to represent such a great community. The thing that disgusts me the most is he's being defended by NPs leadership.

If you want to spit in our faces, do it yourself.

Now I know the response is going to be that he's been warned. Whatever. With that many reports he should be banned.
I completely agree with you. It's ridiculous to have a member like this that contributes absolutely nothing but toxic threads.
 
2
•••
His last week thread titled something like "Who is the most incompetent member on NP" was so useless. At least it was quickly removed.
 
4
•••
His last week thread titled something like "Who is the most incompetent member on NP" was so useless.


I recall that thread, but didn't click on it.

That ought to count as one strike

are there two more obvious strikes?
 
0
•••
There are about 20,000 banned accounts on NamePros, and we add more to that list every day that the limits are pushed too far.

The member in question has received multiple warnings and is approaching that limit. We give everyone the same number of chances to learn from their behavior before their account automatically closes from reaching the threshold, even members who are more controversial than others. ;)

The warning system that we have in place takes care of this with time, but it's not immediate. We do not believe in banning anyone without a fair chance for them to learn our rules and abide by them.
 
17
•••
1
•••
The member in question has received multiple warnings and is approaching that limit.

Is that a fact, Eric?

I've reported him over 50 times for antagonizing, padding, and attacking members.
 
0
•••
Is that a fact, Eric?

I've reported him over 50 times for antagonizing, padding, and attacking members.

this doesn,t mean all your Reports are correct or have Value

:xf.wink:
 
3
•••
this doesn,t mean all your Reports are correct or have Value

:xf.wink:

Unless you are sleeping with the owners or mods... You have no idea how accurate my reports are.

You add zero value.
 
1
•••
Is that a fact, Eric?
It's a rather complex system. The warning system begins with friendly reminders of the rules that the member has violated so that we know they are aware of the rules. If they post pad 50 times before we issue the warning, we'd still only issue 1 warning for that single occurrence. If it happens again, then the warning points increase from there. Depending on the offense, it could escalate quickly. For instance, spamming members in PM is immediately 15x the offense of post padding.

Please continue to report rule violations and everything will sort itself out one way or another. It always does. :)
 
4
•••
NamePros and its leadership has gone soft.

Start banning toxic members like @Michael Ehrhardt. It is utterly absurd that he is allowed to troll the forum. I'd be willing to bet he has received more dislikes and reports in the last week than any other member has in the history of the forum. It's pathetic that he's allowed to represent such a great community. The thing that disgusts me the most is he's being defended by NPs leadership.

If you want to spit in our faces, do it yourself.

Now I know the response is going to be that he's been warned. Whatever. With that many reports he should be banned.

i am toxic ? wow
i thought i am smart and clever
 
0
•••
1
•••
I think you should get banned depending on how many dislikes your comments receive. If the magic number is 200 this dude would had been gone a long time ago.
 
5
•••
I bet there are plenty of "top" members who are controversial enough and have a high enough post count that they have also received that many dislikes ;) Maybe a like to dislike ratio though.
 
5
•••
I bet there are plenty of "top" members who are controversial enough and have a high enough post count that they have also received that many dislikes ;) Maybe a like to dislike ratio though.
It would have to be dislikes from multiple people and not just one person trolling you disliking everthing. Im not even sure if it's possible to track such things and keep tally but it sure would make the forum better in my opinion.
 
1
•••
I think you should get banned depending on how many dislikes your comments receive. If the magic number is 200 this dude would had been gone a long time ago.

"Dislike" often times simply means "disagree"...
 
5
•••
Shane, we have a process that we follow for everyone. There are no feelings or bias involved with it.

Our process is strictly procedural, and it allows those who are willing to learn and abide by the rules the chance to do so.
 
8
•••
Shane you have a history of posting publicly your dislike of both websites and individuals, It seems you just cannot help but be controversial or the center of attention. Even when it comes to "dissing" websites you eventually attack individuals. I am sorry but I am not the type to just sit back, especially as this is a "community". Many of your posts have been "toxic" imo as far as personal affronts I have never posted any such things on here you seem to do it all too often. I think you are an only child used to getting your own way, anyone who has read your posts has caught you being dishonest and down right childish. People who live in glass houses Shane should not throw stones! Besides you are leaving anyway ... Right? ;)
 
11
•••
I'm logging out.
Shane you have a history of posting publicly your dislike of both websites and individuals, It seems you just cannot help but be controversial or the center of attention. Even when it comes to "dissing" websites you eventually attack individuals. I am sorry but I am not the type to just sit back, especially as this is a "community". Many of your posts have been "toxic" imo as far as personal affronts I have never posted any such things on here you seem to do it all too often. I think you are an only child used to getting your own way, anyone who has read your posts has caught you being dishonest and down right childish. People who live in glass houses Shane should not throw stones! Besides you are leaving anyway ... Right? ;)

I would say my nearly 5,000 likes suggests you're the minority here.

Either way, people like you have given me a reason to logout of a forum I've contributed to for a while.

I'm out.
 
3
•••
0
•••
1
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back