IT.COM

new gtlds Amazon invests in .TUBE domains for content streaming

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Arpit131

Top Member
Impact
4,441
Amazon is another mega-corporation known for its investment in media-related products and services.

The company founded by Internet visionary, Jeff Bezos, has become the destination of choice for consumer products.
Amazon is investing in .TUBE domain names, preparing to roll out content streaming services.

We noticed the following dot .TUBE registrations by Amazon:

amazonaws.tube
amazonecho.tube
amazonfiretv.tube
amazonmusic.tube
amazonprime.tube
amazonprimemusic.tube
amazonprimevideo.tube
amazonstudios.tube
amazonvideo.tube
amazonvideodirect.tube
cloudfront.tube
ec2.tube
echo.tube
elastic.tube
firehd.tube
firetv.tube
firetvstick.tube
imdb.tube
primemusic.tube
primevideo.tube
twitchcon.tube


Source: Domain gang
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
for development or defensive regs?

Because a lot of those are ugly regs


elastic.tube is nice, why not fire.tube?
 
1
•••
Ah ok, just read the full article:

"This is just a short list derived from our research, and far from a full search on Amazon’s investment in dot .TUBE domains; the list is expected to increase."
 
0
•••
This is utter nonsense. Amazon is not preparing to roll out content streaming services using these domains - they've defensively registered them so that other people don't use them to infringe content streaming services against the Amazon core domain portfolio. They've made defensive registrations against dozens of their trademarks in numerous new TLDs as part of the Sunrise registration period. Amazon has in excess of 40,000 domain names under management, and makes very extensive defensive registrations.
 
2
•••
This is utter nonsense. Amazon is not preparing to roll out content streaming services using these domains - they've defensively registered them so that other people don't use them to infringe content streaming services against the Amazon core domain portfolio.

You're probably correct but scratching my head why they waste the cash. Apple registered a few too..

APPLE:

applemusic.tube
applenews.tube
appletvos.tube
appstore.tube
imovie.tube
retina.tube
tvos.tube
 
0
•••
You're probably correct but scratching my head why they waste the cash.

I dont think the worlds largest marketplace are worried about a the renewal fees haha
 
0
•••
I think its more for defensive purposes, and its a great idea.

When I want to buy fashion items on amazon i dont got amazon.com and search fashion I go to

AmazonFashion.com, KindleUnlimited.com (for my subscription) AmazonPrime.com (for my subscription) and AmazonBooks.com (for kindle books).....and Amazon.pet (for pet supplies)

Its funny though because I own AmazonBooks.site and tried to use amazon as an affiliate marketer. They didnt allow me to use their services but they also didnt demand me to hand over the trademark name.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
This is utter nonsense. Amazon is not preparing to roll out content streaming services using these domains - they've defensively registered them so that other people don't use them to infringe content streaming services against the Amazon core domain portfolio. They've made defensive registrations against dozens of their trademarks in numerous new TLDs as part of the Sunrise registration period. Amazon has in excess of 40,000 domain names under management, and makes very extensive defensive registrations.
Maybe true, but you present it as if you've talked it over with Jeff Bezos while having a beer together. Are you basing this on hard facts, or just your own logic?
 
0
•••
Amazon has invested in a lot of ngtld domain names, many of them premium. I'm not talking about names that include the word "amazon" or other trademarked names/phrases... They have dozens of keyword ngtld domains that relate to the various services and markets they're involved with. I see them come up in who is data all the time when I'm hunting for expired ngtld names. Surely many of them I see must cost a pretty penny to renew every year.

It's not just defensive registrations to protect trademarks. Amazon and other large companies are very interested in NGTLDs.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Amazon has invested in a lot of ngtld domain names, many of them premium. I'm not talking about names that include the word "amazon" or other trademarked names/phrases... They have dozens of keyword ngtld domains that relate to the various services and markets they're involved with. I see them come up in who is data all the time when I'm hunting for expired ngtld names. Surely many of them I see must cost a pretty penny to renew every year.

It's not just defensive registrations to protect trademarks. Amazon and other large companies are very interested in NGTLDs.
The world has changed drastically and you can not stop them. Before you know it, there will be phrases and sentences domain names being registered; by big corporations.
 
1
•••
You're probably correct but scratching my head why they waste the cash. Apple registered a few too..

Because it's cheaper than fighting a lawsuit if someone grabs it and does something with it that risks infringing the trademarks they own. A key part of hold a trademark is that you have to actively police your trademark, or risk losing the rights you hold. So when the common understanding of the TLD is close to your business, it makes sense to avoid an issue by making defensive registration. As the "tube" suffix has become colloquially synonymous with "media streaming service" because of the popularity of YouTube (and perhaps the best known example of this alignment is XTube) it makes a lot of sense to register to solve a future problem. IP lawyers can cost hundreds of dollars an hour - it is cheaper to make defensive registrations than fight even one infringement. And that generalisation about cost even applies if you are going through the ICANN designated procedures such as URS or UDRP.

Maybe true, but you present it as if you've talked it over with Jeff Bezos while having a beer together. Are you basing this on hard facts, or just your own logic?

Hard facts - in that they've done the same in dozens and dozens of other new TLDs. Just try typing these terms in with your favourite TLD as a suffix. Some registries even have a service for trademark holders where they can simply pay to block various strings - and these have been block in many cases, also. I can say with 99% certainty that we will not see any services being launched by Amazon on the amazonmusic.tube or amazonvideo.tube domain - they would be aligning their valuable trademarks with a significant competitor, and diluting the value of their brand as a result.
 
0
•••
Hard facts - in that they've done the same in dozens and dozens of other new TLDs. Just try typing these terms in with your favourite TLD as a suffix. Some registries even have a service for trademark holders where they can simply pay to block various strings - and these have been block in many cases, also. I can say with 99% certainty that we will not see any services being launched by Amazon on the amazonmusic.tube or amazonvideo.tube domain - they would be aligning their valuable trademarks with a significant competitor, and diluting the value of their brand as a result.
So logic and not hard facts. The only fact you state is the fact that they register a lot of domain names. The rest is your logic......
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back