IT.COM

news U.S. government to ditch the domain-name business on October 1

NameSilo
Watch

deez007

The More I Learn The Less I "Know"Top Member
Impact
12,971





The United States is satisfied that a private company is ready to take over the domain-name system that is the backbone of the Internet, and said in a statement earlier this week that it will allow the nonprofit to operate the system starting October 1.

Internet users will not notice any difference, as ICANN β€” the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers β€” was already doing the work behind the scenes. What it does mark is a key milestone in ICANN itself, which would then operate fully independent from the government. That wasn’t possible previously; with final control over domain names, the feds did have the option to intervene if they wanted to.

While that rarely happened, the most notable intervention was around the β€œ.xxx” domain, which the U.S. (and several other countries, too) put pressure on ICANN to reject. The organization stood down and initially rejected the domain in 2006. However, it reversed that decision in 2011 and allowed .xxx to go live despite continued protest.

Related: Why is the U.S. surrendering control of the internet?

Several Republican lawmakers β€” most notably former presidential candidate Ted Cruz β€” criticized the deal, writing in a July letter that β€œthe proposal will significantly increase the power of foreign governments over the internet.” The GOP even went as far as to codify it in the 2016 Republican platform.

But supporters of the move see it as the best solution. Both Russia and China lobbied hard to get the United Nations to step in and gain control of the system through its International Telecommunications Union arm. A treaty was in place in 2012 to do that, but the U.S., along with the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, refused to sign it over human rights concerns.

ICANN will remain in Los Angeles, so at least the organization running it will remain U.S.-based. Additionally, safeguards are in place to prevent a foreign takeover. β€œThe community’s new powers to challenge board decisions and enforce decisions in court protect against any one party or group of interests from inappropriately influencing ICANN,” a Q&A on the change reads.

Source:
http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/icann-domain-names-october-1/
 
7
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
What is with that title?
 
0
•••
0
•••
It'll be interesting to see what happens with future new Gs with this move.
 
0
•••
0
•••
At the moment they are thinking of 15-20,000 around 2020
 
0
•••
This is a great move towards free internet. If we consider ICANN to act as much as liberal as possible and ensure its future process to assure easy access of internet to the global community then the future of the internet growth should be unimaginable.

I also hope that the cold war between the superpower which influence the UN councils and also the conflicts among the nations doesn't influence in this. Every country should ensure free internet access tot he citizens and also let the internet remain more robust and a medium for communication for the best of intention.

We all know internet is neither designed for good folks not for the bad folks. Internet not meant to be designed for the most secured way of communication but still it can be made a good medium for establishing global peace.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back